Another piece to the Panasonic DMC-FZ1000 puzzle

Monday I was able to get out and do some more test shots with the Panasonic DMC-FZ1000.  This time I shot in jpeg so I could test out the camera’s special effects and styles.  I promised to have some more images from an outing at Sands Point Preserve (shot by my wife GraceAnn with the Panasonic DMC-FZ1000) and you will get that at the end of this first grouping of photos.  Now let me share some images of Times Square here in New York City.  Next to each image will be what special effect setting was used.

P1000587Distinct Scenery effect

P1000588Bright Blue Sky effect

P1000589Glistening Water

P1000590Glittering Illuminations

P1000591Soft Image of a Flower

P1000592Appetizing Food

P1000593Cute Dessert

P1000594Monochrome

P1000596High Key

P1000597Low Key

P1000598Sepia

P1000600Dynamic Monochrome

P1000601Rough Monochrome

P1000602 Silky MonochromeP1000603 Impressive ArtP1000604 High DynamicP1000605 Cross ProcessP1000606 Toy EffectP1000607 Toy PopP1000608 Bleach EffectP1000609 Miniature EffectP1000610 Soft FocusP1000611 FantasyP1000612 Star Filter P1000613Sunshine (this effect is supposed to give the effect of shooting towards the sun without actually doing so).

P1000631still grab from 4k video

A few words about these test shots that I feel I need to tell you about.  First thing is that some of the creative settings (and maybe all but not sure yet) do not move with the RAW file for processing in editing software (not even the one that comes with the camera).  Supposedly you can shoot the effects in RAW and then change them to jpeg in camera and it will retain the effect used.  I haven’t tried that yet but I do know that my wife shot in RAW while on the beach using the Star Filter effect and when I transferred it over to an external hard drive for editing, the effect never came over.  In editing the image looked like any other image and converting it to a jpeg made no difference.

Also, on top of the camera, there is a dial and on the dial you have two (2) settings where you can find these effects.  Both have monochrome settings and settings that allow you to produce the “star like” effect that one might want from reflective surfaces.  In fact there are a total of three such settings.  A bit of an over kill here.  There are some other settings I have not tried out yet.  There are a series of effects for shooting portraits along with a few for night scenes and a few others not worth mentioning because I will not try those out.  The last photo is pretty impressive due to the fact that it came from the camera’s 4k video (now that is a big plus).

That is it for now.  Below you will find more images shot with the Panasonic DMC-FZ1000 from the Sands Point Preserve.  Don’t forget!  No post for next week as I’ll be on vacation.

Warmly ~ R

P1000283 P1000208 P1000209 P1000233 P1000242 P1000283 P1000297 P1000336 P1000450 P1000513 P1000555 P1000559

Advertisements

Sands Point Preserve – The Guggenheim Estate

DSC_4478

A castle on Long Island and just a short drive from Manhattan?  Really?

First let me say that for me to personally anoint this place as a “photographers paradise” will require another visit.  This time during late spring or early summer when the leaves are back, flowers are in bloom and birds are hanging around.  Despite the lack of wildlife (at least a variety of birds other than the common house sparrow and the seagulls on the beach) it was still a good start due to being on a cliff that overlooks Hempstead Bay.  Not only do you have the elevated view but a path that takes you down to the rocky beach too.

DSC_4508 a view of the castle from one of the many walking trails.

DSC_4464one point on the beach.

We didn’t get a chance to check out the inside of the homes here but we did walk all of the trails.  They have a man made pound that was iced over (really didn’t feel this was worth taking a photo of) and an abandoned building near the pond on the other side of a walking bridge.

DSC_4515abandoned building near pond

On one of the many trails you will also come across another bridge that is photo worthy.

DSC_4506another bridge on a walking path.

Earlier I said that this was a good start.  Maybe I should have said a nice start instead.  It’s a beautiful estate but not quite what I was hoping for (I’m pretty demanding in my expectations as a photographer though) but I can say that this place is great for non-photographers.  The trails are great.  One the trails is a fitness trail with workout station at different points.  The other thing that makes this place great is the fact that they allow you to bring your dog (granted it must be kept on a leash at all times).  Whether you are on the trails or the beach you are able to bring your dog along.

DSC_4434

DSC_4439

It’s $10 dollars per car load to get in (which is great if you car pool and are not alone) and plenty of picnic tables to enjoy your lunch outdoors.  Our day here was met with very little foot traffic which makes for a great outing.  Whether this is due to the time of year or not I don’t know but I will have that answer soon once it warms up.  I also have to point out that getting here had to be one of the easiest drives that we have done on Long Island.

DSC_4419

I look forward in bringing more to you on Sands Point Preserve once it warms up but until then get ready for Friday’s blog.  I will be continuing my discussion on the Panasonic DMC-FZ1000 with more images of Sands Point Preserve.

Best ~ R.

Long Exposure Magic

DSC_4405 ISO 100mm f/16 @ 126.0 SEC ND filter 3.0 (10 stops) and CL Polarizer.

Long exposure photography can create magical looking images.  As with everything thing else in photography there is a good mixture of technical knowledge needed as well as creative vision to conceptualize what it is you are wanting to create.  The technical side to this involves not only knowing what your camera is capable of from the inside but he extra equipment that will be needed.

I’m sure you can guess that a tripod, of course, is a must (or something solid that doesn’t move to set the camera on).  Two other things you’ll want to have (if you don’t already) is a remote shutter release and a Neutral Density filter.  The filter is where things can get confusing and tricky because they make some many different grades of it.  They range from 0.1 (.3 stop of light reduction) to 4.8 (16 stops of light reduction).  The images that I am sharing today you’ll easily be able to tale which ones were done with a ND filter and the ones that were only with a polarizer filter.

P1000156ISO 125, f/3.6 @ 1/1600th sec no filter

DSC_4391ISO 100, f/14 @ 70.0 sec, ND filter #3 and CL Polarizer

How do you feel when you look at the photo of the New York City skyline shot at 1/1600th sec compared to the one shot at 70 sec (70 seconds)?  Gives the second photo more of a “painting” feel without the need for photoshop (or any other software editing program).  With that being said you will still need to do a little work in post when it comes to shooting long exposures due to noise.  Of course you can set your camera up to reduce the noise in camera, it’s just something that I do not prefer myself.  I like to have complete control of my final output.  You’ll just have to test how well your camera processes it internally and see if you like the results.

P1000184ISO 125, f/8 @ 1/200th sec no filter.

DSC_4407ISO 100, f/18 @ 122 sec, ND filter #3 and CL Polarizer.

On the next two pictures what I want to point out is the reflection of the lighthouse.  Even though I cut this image short, you’ll notice how the reflection of the lighthouse on the water is barely recognizable but in the second photo it is more defined due to the smoothing out of the water.  There are many ways that shooting with long exposure (and having the right tools) can help create more interesting photos. Let’s get back to that tripod for a second because this is very important due the length of exposures you will often be working with.  Use either a heavy duty tripod (something weighty) or find a way to hang your camera bag off of the tripod to give it more weight for sturdiness.  This will make the difference in everything in the frame that is stationary and should be in focus stays in focus.  The day that I shot these photos (shooting along the walk of Roosevelt Island towards New York City skyline) it was quite breezy and sometimes down right gusty.  Thankfully my tripod has a hook on the bottom of the center column and was able to hang my bag on it.  That is one of the problems with shooting up here during winter time and that it is usually breezy or windy.

DSC_4397ISO 100, f/18 @ 179.0 sec, ND filter #3 and CL Polarizer.

What are some of the different ways to use long exposure photography?  As I’ve demonstrated here you can use it to smooth out moving water in waterscapes but you can use it for light painting, moving car streaks, creating abstracts, star streaks and removing people (or other moving objects) from your scene without the need to be a photo editing guru.  I will be making this particular subject a three part series with one being a mixture of light painting, nighttime car streaks and creative abstracts.

Everything about photography requires getting out there and shooting…a lot.  It takes practice and patience when you are really trying to hone your craft and become more and more of an artist.  Most of my waterscapes are shot in daylight after the sun has come up and before it begins to set.  The amount of sunlight you have working against you (and how much of the smooth “painting” effect you want) will depend on what ND filter you will use.  As you noticed, I also used a CL  (circular) Polarizer filter along with a ND filter.  I do this because polarizers are great for waterscapes plus it also added an extra degree of light cut-off.  See, unless you were shooting a night scene, you will have to use a ND filter to be able to get this effect.  With out one you’ll never be able to slow down your camera’s shutter (or use the “bulb” function) enough without blowing out (white out of image) the photo.  Remember when I mentioned that ND filters come in different degrees of light cut-off?  That’s because you lighting may dictate that you need a 0.3 (rather than 3.0) to get the effect.  Photographers who specialize in this type of photography will have a set of ND filters.  If you buy a set or you get a few different ND filters you’ll then have the option of even stacking them together to allow for even longer exposure.  I have even seen someone use them at night to shoot the stars.  I mentioned the “bulb” feature on your camera half way of this paragraph and if you are not sure what that is…no worries.  It’s simply a setting to be used with a remote release that allows you to hold the shutter open for how ever long you want.  Most cameras will only allow for the shutter to stay open for a certain amount of time on it’s on but gives this option for you as the photographer to decide how long the shutter needs to stay open.

Every shot that I shared with you showing the effect of long exposures were done on the “bulb” mode (and I ALWAYS use a remote release for this).  The exposures were too long for the camera on it’s own.  You’ll just have (again) practice.  Tiffen offers a kit which gives you a set of 3 filters and is a pretty good set to start with and as I mentioned you can stack the filters when needed.  Another type of ND filter that is out there that you’ll no doubt be tempted to get is the variable ND filter.  This filter is two filter together with one of them able to rotate.  As you turn the front element the filter lightens and darkens gradually.  This is great up until you get to the darker points of its rotation.  Once you get to that point it will start to shift colors producing unpleasant photos (this is from my own experience for what I have used and what I’ve read about other users of other manufacturers).  My opinion is to stick with individual filters.  Before you buy a filter (or filters) please read the user reviews.  The last thing you want to do is buy a filter and end up not happy with it’s clarity results.

Check out Wednesday’s post.  I will be talking about the trip we took out to Sands Point Preserve with some photos we took and give you my opinion on how this rates for a “photographers paradise”.  I will be taking time off after this Friday for a much needed vacation to go and visit family and friends that I haven’t seen in 2 years.  So the following week there will be no blogging from from me but will be revamping with some exciting things when I start back up (especially when it warms up!).

Best ~ R

DSC_4385

Day 3 with the Panasonic DMC-FZ1000…well some of the day anyway…

Due to the fact that we have been having less than ideal outdoor conditions lately, I have been forced to look for “windows of opportunity” and jump in and shoot when it’s there.  It’s because of that I’m still not ready go give you my personal thoughts on this camera BUT I WILL share a few images that I was able to grab today from Roosevelt Island in New York City.  Please not that I did not use any filters.  The images were shot in RAW and converted to jpeg with slight touchups in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 (unless otherwise noted).

P1000182 P1000189 P1000190 P1000194 P1000195 P1000196untouched in post other than jpeg conversion.

I have to say one thing though and that is that I’m very impressed with how this camera meters the lighting.  This would be difficult for most cameras it this Panasonic was darn close.  More shooting to come tomorrow and Saturday with Saturday’s photo outing being extra special.  Going somewhere on Long Island that has a castle and I look forward to telling you all about it on Wednesday.

Best ~ R

Connetquot River State Park Preserve…another nature paradise.

DSC_6531 Part of the Connetquot River

This is a beautiful state park.  It has plenty of trails. Some that are on asphalt and many on the beaten path through forest.  The Connetquot River runs through that park where a trout fishery has been established.  My wife GraceAnn and I had just finished up some business in the area early (again) and was looking for something to do (or a new place to see).  Of course I utilize my smart phone to look up parks within a 20 mile radius of where we were at.  Luckily for me the Connetquot River State Park Preserve came up as being really close and I’m a sucker for state parks.  I had my basic camera gear so if nothing else I would be able to get a few shots to decide later if this is a place to come back to.  Unfortunately though it was summer (normally a good thing for me) and at peek tick season.  Of course when we pulled in there were warning signs posted all over that they were experiencing a higher than normal tick infestation.  Of course this was a last minute decision thanks to being done early from an earlier commitment and did not have bug spray for this.  No worries though because the gate guard was kind enough to let us use hers.  So after a liberal spraying ourselves we set off to explore the park.

p1130339_44a taken from the web

The first thing you come to is this incredible estate lodge.  Do to the fact that we didn’t have all day we chose not to go inside so I have nothing to report about the coolness of the building other than what you see here.  We will be going back, though it may being during winter due to the ticks.  Speaking of winter, you can even do cross country skiing there.  There are plenty of wildlife (so we are told) but the only thing we experienced were some water fowls.  It is truly scenic when the trail hits the river area.  Most areas you can even see the bottom making the water seem very inviting.  Trout fishing is very popular here (with permit only) thanks to the fishery.  I think (but I can’t confirm right now) that fly fishing is only allowed (which I am eager to learn).  I will have another report (and maybe a small documentary about the park if I can get the permission) at another time when I can go there and spend a full day.  If you are there for just sightseeing then the entry fee is only $8 per car but you have to leave your four legged friends behind (thankfully we left our dogs at home).  No biggie considering the tick problem they had.  Check it out though just plan wisely your trip.  Summer…take bug repellent!

connqresize4 taken from web

Best ~ R

More pics taken with the new Panasonic DMC-FZ1000

P1000136

This isn’t my “official” in-the-field review yet.  My intentions were to have had a full day of testing most (if not all) of the camera’s vast shooting options.  Unfortunately I wasn’t able (rather not willing) to do that.  It turned out to be just too cold for something I wasn’t receiving some kind of compensation for.  The short time I was out in the field I was able to find a couple of weaknesses of the camera so far.  Nothing that would put it off the list yet but things to be considered.  So far I have found that it’s focusing has pluses and minuses as well as noise at higher ISO but the latter is to be expected in camera’s with smaller sensors (though this sensor is bigger than most which shows in the photo quality).  I won’t go into details today as I want to save that for the final report.  From the shots I have done so far does have the camera leaning to being a great travel camera but what I want to know is will this be a great camera for vacationing pros or budget minded pros looking for that second or third camera.

P1000139

Until next time ~ R

First Impressions of the Panasonic DMC-FZ1000 digital “bridge” camera.

1057135Panasonic DMC-FZ1000

I’m going to try and shorten today’s blog a little bit.  There has been a lot of buzz about this “little” camera and even I couldn’t wait to get my hands on one to test it out.  Well my friends…I have my hands on one!  I went out for about an hour today just to get a feel for it and I’ll share a few of those images with you.  But my first impression is that many of the other reviews I have read were nearly spot on and others I can’t help but wonder if they were written by “point and shoot” camera users.  I’m saying this because some of the reviews talk about how surprised at how heavy it is.  If you shoot with a DSLR and have been looking for the “second” camera, one that could double as the travel camera then you will find it to be on the lighter side.

P1000013RAW converted to jpeg only.  Shot at ISO 125, 1/1000 sec and f/2.8

I was very surprised at how well it handled the lighting and it’s very snappy auto focus.  I do mean snappy fast.  Many reviews also talked about it’s abundance of settings and how there needed to be a slightly better way of getting to those options.  I skimmed through the manual and then went out side.  I was able to pretty much learn how to quickly make adjustments (except turning the on camera flash to test it…had to read the manual for that…I’ll explain later…maybe) to settings as needed.  As every camera out there, there are some things that could be better but all in all not a bad start.

P1000026RAW converted to jpeg only. Shot at ISO 400, 1/320 sec and f/4.

The pictures I’m sharing today were shot with the FZ1000’s “standard” camera setting.  The “standard” or “neutral” setting in camera’s are often the preferred settings when shooting RAW.  These settings gives you better control in post production for your colors without loss (or very little loss) to detail.  Tomorrow I will be spending the day out putting it through it’s paces.  You won’t find charts and graphs in my reviews.  Why should I go through that kind of trouble to test a camera out when enough people are doing that already?  Besides, to me, the best test is the real world test.  I will be testing it’s many different settings and scene files as well as the still grab from shooting 4k video.  That review will be either next Friday or the following Friday.

P1000049RAW converted to jpeg only.  Shot at ISO 800, 1/60th sec and f/5/6

To finish off what my first impressions of this camera are, I have to harp on the body and construction of the camera.  I find it very strange that you would make a camera where the lens feels as if it was never meant for this camera body.  You this great glass that is incased inside a very solid feeling tube housing to to be coupled to a camera that feels cheap.  I know it doesn’t matter how if feels but rather how it holds up.  It’s here that I am like so many of my fellow DSLR users that we WANT that feeling of ruggedness.  I’m still scratching my head as to why the tripod mounting hole isn’t lined up with the lens.  I use a rapid sling strap (instead of the standard camera strap) which screws into the bottom of the camera and guess what…I had to take it off to be able to open the battery compartment door.  That is shameful Panasonic.  It’s bad enough that the SD card goes where the battery goes but that would be no big deal if the battery was easy to get to.  Speaking of battery doors.  This was another ball dropped by Panasonic.  The door has this little slide that you have to slide back to open it and when you close it you have to slide it back.  I haven’t used a camera  (heck not sure if ever) since who knows when that didn’t self lock with you closed it.  We’ll see if they make up for those short comings once I’m done testing it out.

Until the next time ~ R

Best ~ R